When one of the few banking analysts who correctly predicted the financial crisis (aka debt crisis) and the subsequent popping of the real estate bubble takes the time to speak, you should make the time investment to listen.
Based upon weak economic fundamentals across the board, Meredith Whitney is still bearish on the U.S. housing sector.
To paraphrase a 10 minute interview:
I have no doubt we’ll see a double dip in housing.
[RSS & Email readers may need to click to site for video]
Doesn’t get more telling than that…
Specific talking points worthy of mention:
Bottom line: if you’re hoping for a bounce in real estate any time soon, you’re out of luck, because prices will once again test the 2009 lows or break through those lows altogether.
(Although, San Francisco is bucking this trend presumably due to a fairly strong local economy and the entrepreneurial spirit of Silicon Valley.)
From my (nonprofessional) vantage point:
As always, this is pure speculation and I could be completely wrong, but if you’re looking to jump into the real estate investing game, it’s in your best interest to weigh all of the negatives along with the positives.
Remember your blog on half of all mortgages being underwater by 2012. Do you still agree with your summation?
Yes, I would say that is plausible based on the current numbers, although, it doesn’t mean it will occur. With the U.S. Government is doing everything in it’s power to prop up the housing market (First Time Home Buyer tax credit, super low interest rates, etc.), I’m not sure if half of all mortgaged homeowners will be underwater by end of 2011.
The current policy seems to promote a slow pull of the “Band Aid” rather than ripping it off quickly. Whether that is supposed to allow a slow wind down to calm deflationary fears or to prevent vulture investors from swooping in all at once, is anyone’s best guess.
That is an astute observation Khaleef.
I’m of the rare belief that a person should read twice the amount of ideas/conclusions that they disagree with, rather than just follow along with ideas they perceive to be true. It promotes questions and analytical thought, rather than being a lemming.
We have come to believe that double digit increases in real estate prices are normal. They are not. Real estate prices barely keep up with inflation in the long run. We still need a drop of about 15% to get to the long term average. And this does not include an overshoot on the downside, which usually happens in a bust.
I think you give great advice in your first response. “A person should read twice the amount of ideas/conclusions that they disagree with, rather than just follow along with ideas they perceive to be true.” Doing this will either increase your resolve or find the faults in your own thinking. It is a strategy to which I also subscribe. I have done the best trades in my life when I looked to talk to people who disagreed with my investing idea.
If I disagree with the double dip idea it’s only because I don’t think we’ve recovered from the first dip–if it continues it’ll all be one big dip.
In regard to your (Matt’s) first point about homeowners not believing the double dip theory–I think they actually might based on actions. In my neck of the woods there are relatively few houses on the market, leading me to believe that a lot of perspective sellers have abandoned hope of selling their homes.
They MAY be holding on waiting for the price spiral to move upwards once again, as it always has reliably in the past OR they might have decided that trading up to a more expensive one with a bigger payment is too risky.
Either way if the market is on life support with fixed rate loans below 5% the situation is very fragile and subject to major disruption should rates rise substantially.
2:25 pm
I agree with her assessment. I actually can’t see how an unbiased economist could come up with a positive model! but these are the same economists that told us that everything would be fine a few years ago! I’m glad there are a few (like Mauldin, Roubini, etc) that will still speak the truth!