Similar to last quarter’s Lending Club investment results and summary, I’m happy to report that I’m still earning a very respectable 14% return on my investments with no defaults.
True to form, I’ve made a few tweaks here and there to my original Lending Club investment strategy.
Dabbling in the higher ROI, higher risk notes. Occasionally, I find a really good loan application in the higher risk, Grade E and F notes that I feel should not be there. Lending Club’s underwriting is pretty tough, so in some circumstances, I’ll find what I consider a solid borrower who, in my opinion, probably deserves to be a Grade C or D note but gets labeled as Grade E and F. These might be borrowers who do not meticulously work at keeping a 720+ credit score, who have had their credit card limits cut negatively affecting their Debt to Income (DTI) ratio resulting in a short term hit to their FICO score, or might have missed a single payment 1 to 5 years ago but got it caught up without going to collections. These are what I consider the hidden gems, where you get high ROIs without the high default risk, but then again, I could be completely wrong because I am by no means a Lending Club or P2P Lending expert.As always, there is a certain amount of risk in creating an investment portfolio of this type. If you’re new to social lending and you’re looking to put some money to work or you’re a part of the Move Your Money movement, I would suggest that you start slow, don’t chase the high yield notes right out of the gate, and find a group of investors or a experienced investor to learn from or bounce a few ideas off of. Their experience and past mistakes could be your future gains.
10:07 am
Nice returns, hope you can keep ‘em flowing.
I wanted to ask about your loan selection rules. I understood that you use the spreadsheet to filter applications. How much do you put weight into quantitive information (like employer, job security) versus qualitative. For example, borrower seeks loan for interesting business plan, but according to your criteria borrower might not be the best possible pick.
[Reply]
Matt SF Reply:
June 22nd, 2010 at 1:40 pm
Thanks Tuomas! I hope they keep rolling in as well.
My top priority is to seek loan repayment, so that means I’m looking for the borrowers with a steady source of income and are likely to remain employed over the course of the loan. That means I’m giving borrowers who are physicians, nurses, tenured college professors, senior scientists/engineers, etc., precedent over folks who work in retail, sales, or outsource sensitive fields.
I also look at the past credit history, in terms of their willingness and ability to repay, but I’m betting that if I find borrowers who have secure jobs, in-demand jobs, and professions where they could find another job within 1-2 months, that my defaults will be minimized.
I do not focus on quantitative metrics as much as I probably should, but I do take a look at total Revolving Credit Balance and the Debt To Income (DTI) ratio. If they have an excessively high RCB, they might find refuge in bankruptcy if they can’t service their debt. If they are cash flow limited with a high DTI, their secured debts (mortgage for shelter, car payments for transportation) might get prioritized, and their nonsecured debt (my investment in them) might get pushed aside since their P2P loan (e.g. my investment) does not pay for their basic needs.
I also do not focus on the use of the loan all that much. I don’t lend money to anyone who wants to buy a motorcycle or reinvest back into P2P notes, but I don’t think it matters all that much as long as you lend to a responsible borrower who has a long term history of repaying his/her debts, has a solid job history, has solid cash flow, and can stay employed over the lifetime of their loan.
I probably gave away my “secret sauce recipe” here, but hope that helps boost your returns.
[Reply]