<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brooksley Born&#8217;s story: Fighting Wall Street, Rubin &amp; Greenspan was a Bad Career Move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steadfastfinances.com/blog/2009/10/22/brooksley-borns-story-fighting-wall-street-rubin-greenspan-was-a-bad-career-move/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steadfastfinances.com/blog/2009/10/22/brooksley-borns-story-fighting-wall-street-rubin-greenspan-was-a-bad-career-move/</link>
	<description>A Personal Finance &#38; Investing 101 blog that delves into current events, consumer education, and techniques to improve your bottom line.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Psychology of Bubbles: Using Hindsight to Examine Why We Bought into the Hype &#124; Steadfast Finances</title>
		<link>http://steadfastfinances.com/blog/2009/10/22/brooksley-borns-story-fighting-wall-street-rubin-greenspan-was-a-bad-career-move/comment-page-1/#comment-7006</link>
		<dc:creator>The Psychology of Bubbles: Using Hindsight to Examine Why We Bought into the Hype &#124; Steadfast Finances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadfastfinances.com/blog/?p=2583#comment-7006</guid>
		<description>[...] the historical trendline. It begs the question if the real estate bubble was artificially created (thank you Rubin, Greenspan and Wall Street) or if we had legalized marijuana back in 2000 and got happy with the mortgage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the historical trendline. It begs the question if the real estate bubble was artificially created (thank you Rubin, Greenspan and Wall Street) or if we had legalized marijuana back in 2000 and got happy with the mortgage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzzo</title>
		<link>http://steadfastfinances.com/blog/2009/10/22/brooksley-borns-story-fighting-wall-street-rubin-greenspan-was-a-bad-career-move/comment-page-1/#comment-5909</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadfastfinances.com/blog/?p=2583#comment-5909</guid>
		<description>Now you know why I&#039;m so cynical about Wall Street.

What I came away with from watching &quot;The Warning&quot;, is that Greenspan and his Wall Street (and even regulatory) cohorts continually spout laissez faire economic principles, but when the &quot;you know what&quot; hit the fan in 1998, they go all out to convince the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Plunge Protection Team&lt;/a&gt; that the government needs to bail them out or our economy will collapse.

After the taxpayers quietly save their asses that time, do you think that they would have changed their ways and heeded Brooksley Born&#039;s advice? No way. They continue on the same laissez faire path, eliminating any opposition (Brooksley Born), until this current crisis.

What happens next? The same laissez faire group (now including Paulson) says that without another government bailout our economy will &lt;em&gt;again&lt;/em&gt; collapse, and taxpayers are forced to come to the rescue. It&#039;s been over a year now since the crisis started. Has there been any &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; regulatory enforcement or criminal prosecutions? No.

It doesn&#039;t take a genius to figure out that the purpose of spouting laissez faire economic principles is to prevent any regulatory interference into their corrupt financial schemes.

Any reasonable person would also think that fraud of such magnitude against the American public would constitute immediate prosecution, but these people are still in power and still enjoying their riches at taxpayer expense. Who&#039;s going to prosecute them, the politicians in their pockets? Yeah, right.

This cycle of corruption will continue until our economy actually does collapse and chaos ensues. I don&#039;t know when that will be, but only another American Revolution (similar to the French Revolution) will change things.

FRONTLINE deserves the highest honors for revealing the heroic story of Brooksley Born. It&#039;s a true shame that there aren&#039;t more people like her in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you know why I&#8217;m so cynical about Wall Street.</p>
<p>What I came away with from watching &#8220;The Warning&#8221;, is that Greenspan and his Wall Street (and even regulatory) cohorts continually spout laissez faire economic principles, but when the &#8220;you know what&#8221; hit the fan in 1998, they go all out to convince the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Group_on_Financial_Markets" rel="nofollow">Plunge Protection Team</a> that the government needs to bail them out or our economy will collapse.</p>
<p>After the taxpayers quietly save their asses that time, do you think that they would have changed their ways and heeded Brooksley Born&#8217;s advice? No way. They continue on the same laissez faire path, eliminating any opposition (Brooksley Born), until this current crisis.</p>
<p>What happens next? The same laissez faire group (now including Paulson) says that without another government bailout our economy will <em>again</em> collapse, and taxpayers are forced to come to the rescue. It&#8217;s been over a year now since the crisis started. Has there been any <em>real</em> regulatory enforcement or criminal prosecutions? No.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t take a genius to figure out that the purpose of spouting laissez faire economic principles is to prevent any regulatory interference into their corrupt financial schemes.</p>
<p>Any reasonable person would also think that fraud of such magnitude against the American public would constitute immediate prosecution, but these people are still in power and still enjoying their riches at taxpayer expense. Who&#8217;s going to prosecute them, the politicians in their pockets? Yeah, right.</p>
<p>This cycle of corruption will continue until our economy actually does collapse and chaos ensues. I don&#8217;t know when that will be, but only another American Revolution (similar to the French Revolution) will change things.</p>
<p>FRONTLINE deserves the highest honors for revealing the heroic story of Brooksley Born. It&#8217;s a true shame that there aren&#8217;t more people like her in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
