I’ve been keeping a small list of humorous personal finance faux pas from my circle of family and friends that easily qualify for the old Penny Wise, Pound Foolish idiom for a while now.
If you’re not familiar with the phrase, it’s generally defined as:
Being frugal or cautious with small amounts of money, but being gullible or wasteful with larger amounts of money.
I enjoy this phrase simply because it brings a sort of Three Stooges vibe to the discussion, and since public humiliation is generally a successful way of teaching one not to do dumb things, you just know I would have to list a few here.
Perhaps I’m being overly critical since much of my life revolves around the financial world, but I can’t seem to figure out why someone would worry about saving a few bucks here and there, only to pay out way more in the end when the final expenses are tabulated.
Then again, I guess that’s why some people like to play Chess and others like to play Checkers… sometimes people just don’t like to think more than one or two moves ahead.
Maybe I should have given names, but rest assured, they’re real. What strikes me as so [beep] odd, and the reason why I wrote the post, was to show just how frugal people can be to try to save money, but somehow lose site of the bigger picture.
To me, Checkers is a game where you have to think ahead, but the game itself doesn’t require that many forward thinking steps and the possible moves are greatly restricted by the pieces themselves. In Chess, there are far more permutations the game can take.
That sucks man… so eww.
Nah, I’ve never played checkers hardcore-ish, but b/cuz I like playing chess brute force-thinking was easy.
My main point is that while checkers has less moves, each move has greater consequences due to the “forceful” nature of the real game.
It has actually been solved iirc. So removing the memory aspect then moves require a larger forward search =)
It’s just a random bit of trivia =)
2:29 am
I don’t like this post because I can’t believe any of the 7 to exist =)
Well… maybe #1… and #2… and… #3-4… 5 sounds common… i know people who do 6…and yea 7 seems reasonable.
…
……
Man people..
So I do have one minor complaint… I think checkers actually requires more forward thinking (when you play with the real rules) because of being forced to take. That is, any one move can have more massive swing than any one move in chess. Of course I’ve never played checkers competitively but this is just my basic understanding of the game =)