How Much Would You Pay to Voice Your Opinion?

Filed in Public Awareness 4 comments

Texas hedge fund manager Bill Perkins dropped $80,000 — of his own money — to take out another full page ad in today’s New York Times.

Why?

To ask simple, potentially inflammatory, questions about the use of the TARP bailout funds.

Here are the questions to date:

Question #1: Does anyone else find it troubling that a government bailed out bank (Goldman Sachs) is buying a European Energy Speculation Outfit?  It’s your money!!!

Question #2:  Why is the U.S. Treasury hiding how the banks and AIG are spending our money (TARP)?  It’s your money!!!

His goal is to raise public awareness that the Feds might not actually know how and where our tax dollars are being spent, and the American public is purposefully being kept in the dark.  Presumably, it’s because the government doesn’t know how the funds are being spent, or worse, they simply don’t want us to know.

And all this time I thought all hedge fund guys were evil oil speculators who played the real life version of Mr. Burns (from The Simpsons).  Guess I was wrong on that one.

Would you Drop $80k on Advertising for the Greater Good?

This guy might have unintentionally caused one of the great ethical debates of 2009.

Ask yourself this simplistic question:

If you had the financial capacity to drop thousands of dollars on an advertising campaign to increase public awareness, with no intention of benefiting your own personal finances or becoming an overnight celebrity… would you do it?

I think I probably would.  Or at least I like to think that I think I would.  As we all know, it’s one thing to jump off the high dive and quite another to say we’re going to jump off the high dive.

In terms of advertising on this magnitude (e.g. $80,000 per advertisement), I would probably have to be in the low double digit millionaire range before I would attempt something on Mr. Perkins’ scale.

Billionaire T. Boone Pickens certainly stepped up to the plate in 2008 at the height of the energy crisis by creating the wildly successful Pickens Plan.  But I struggle to identify anyone else who has found substantial success in a multi-pronged advertising campaign with the sole intent of gathering supporters to raise public awareness and insist that the government make changes to antiquated policies.  Other than the massive media blitz in electing President Barack Obama of course.

Aren’t Newspaper Ads Dead?

I might be the new kid on the block when it comes to blogging and social media, but I do know that newspapers are slowly going extinct.  Even the once mighty New York Times has taken it’s lumps in the last decade.

With that in mind, why not link up with as many social media gurus or like minded bloggers, and put the word out online instead?  Most people that I’ve encountered who have strong disdain for the TARP program are primarily in the non-baby boomer category (I’m sure there are a few exceptions) who will actually have to pay back all of this newly acquired debt.

So why not start a blog called Tracking The TARP or TARP Watch, find a few fanatical writers and pay them pennies on the dollar to do their thing?  Just seems like a better use of funds to me.

I bring up this example after watching Gary Vaynerchuk’s talk at the INMAN

Enough said!

[Video: Minute 31:00 for Twitter vs. Traditional Media excerpt]

Granted, Gary has a huge web presence and is one of the best public speakers around, but creating online collaborations with like minded people who will carry on your message is certainly more effective than a full page ad in the NY Times.

Or am I wrong?

***

The full CNBC video with Bill Perkins debating the authenticity and effectiveness of his transparency campaign can be seen at this CNBC link.

Like the article? Share it!
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Tipd
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Print
  • email
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Related Posts Related Websites
Posted by Matt SF   @   27 January 2009 4 comments
Tags : , , , ,

4 Comments

Comments
Jan 29, 2009
3:22 pm

The whole time I was thinking “$80k for one page in the NY Times?” Ripoff. He would have done much better to spend $70k to build a nice website, and then pay Kevin Rose $10k under the table to Digg it up. Not that Kevin Rose takes bribes, but he could find someone.

Or he could have simply given $80k to someone who could use it too keep their house.

[Reply]

Jan 29, 2009
3:48 pm
#2 Matt :

Yeah, he had lots of choices on this one but I thought it was kinda cool of the guy to make the effort.

Too bad the message dies after 1 day with those one day ads, but maybe it’s protocol that bigtime traders advertise in the NY Times.

Then again, a blog article lasts forever!

[Reply]

Feb 1, 2009
9:59 am

It’s cool that he is making a stand on something he believes in. Luckily he can afford to make such a spendy public awareness “campaign”. And he does present an excellent question. Hopefully he can start that blog like Matt and the weakonomist mentioned.

Jules @ The Francophile Files

[Reply]

Trackbacks to this post.
Leave a Comment

Name

Email

Website

CommentLuv Enabled

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»
Powered by Wordpress   |   Delighted designed by Web Hosting   |   Song Lyrics   |   Free Download Ebook   |   Gadget Review